Best LLM for RAG: vector search + retrieval in ₹
Best AI model for RAG systems in India. DeepSeek, Claude, Qwen—context, latency, ₹ cost, and vector compatibility.
Best LLM for RAG: GPT-5 and Claude lead; DeepSeek wins on ₹
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pairs vector search with an LLM that grounds answers in your docs. GPT-5 and Claude excel at dense retrieval + long-context reasoning. DeepSeek offers the same quality at half the ₹ cost. Via unoblox, you get all three, native embeddings API, and ₹-native billing for your entire RAG stack.
RAG model guide
| Model | Context | ₹ Input | Reasoning | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 | 128K | ₹126 | Exceptional | Precise Q&A, complex queries |
| Claude Opus | 200K | ₹504 | Excellent | Long docs, nuanced answers |
| DeepSeek V3.2 | 64K | ₹26.21 | Very good | Budget RAG, high volume |
| Qwen3 Max | 32K | ₹120.95 | Excellent | Vision RAG, multimodal |
| Llama Maverick | 32K | ₹20.16 | Good | OSS workflows, cost-sensitive |
Why context window matters for RAG
Longer context = more retrieved docs in one pass. GPT-5's 128K window lets you stuff 20–30 document chunks into a single prompt, improving coherence. Claude Opus's 200K is even better for book-length corpora. DeepSeek's 64K is sufficient for most use cases.
Building RAG with unoblox
Unoblox provides the full RAG stack:
- Native
/v1/embeddings— Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B at ₹0 (free tier). - Retrieval LLM — DeepSeek, GPT-5, Claude, or Qwen.
- Native
/v1/rerank— Qwen3-Reranker-0.6B (re-score search results before LLM). - One endpoint — No API switching, single ₹-denominated bill.
import requests
BASE_URL = "https://api.unoblox.ai/v1"
KEY = "ub-gw-..."
# Step 1: Embed query
resp = requests.post(
f"{BASE_URL}/embeddings",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {KEY}"},
json={"model": "qwen/qwen3-embedding-0.6b", "input": "What is RAG?"}
)
query_embedding = resp.json()["data"][0]["embedding"]
# Step 2: Vector search (your DB: Pinecone, Milvus, Weaviate)
# ... retrieve top-k docs ...
# Step 3: Rerank results (optional, keeps high-quality docs first)
rerank_resp = requests.post(
f"{BASE_URL}/rerank",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {KEY}"},
json={
"model": "qwen/qwen3-reranker-0.6b",
"query": "What is RAG?",
"documents": [retrieved_docs]
}
)
# Step 4: Call LLM with top docs
llm_resp = requests.post(
f"{BASE_URL}/chat/completions",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {KEY}"},
json={
"model": "deepseek-ai/deepseek-v3.2", # or gpt-5, claude-opus
"messages": [
{"role": "system", "content": "Answer based on these docs:"},
{"role": "user", "content": f"Query: {query}\nDocs: {reranked_docs}"}
]
}
)
Cost breakdown (10,000 queries against a 100-doc corpus)
- Embedding queries: ~100 tokens each, Qwen3-Embedding — ₹0 (free tier).
- Reranking: top candidates per query, Qwen3-Reranker — ₹0 (free tier).
- LLM synthesis (DeepSeek V3.2):
3K input + 500 output tokens per query ≈ ₹0.10 per query → **₹1,000 for 10,000 queries**. - Same workload on GPT-4o: same token counts ≈ ₹1.26 per query → ~₹12,600 for 10,000 queries.
Retrieval (embedding + reranking) is free either way — the LLM you pick for synthesis is what moves your bill.
Frequently asked questions
Q: Should I always use the longest-context model? No. DeepSeek's 64K is enough for most RAG. Longer context adds latency (₹ cost same per token).
Q: Do I need a reranker? For high-recall searches (50+ docs), yes—reranking meaningfully improves what reaches the LLM by demoting weak matches. For tight searches (top 5), it is optional.
Q: Can I fine-tune the embedding model? Not via unoblox API, but you can use Qwen3-Embedding's open weights locally.
Q: Do I need to know the vector dimension in advance? Yes, for your vector DB schema — call the embeddings endpoint once and read the dimension off the response. It's compatible with all major vector DBs regardless of size.
Q: Is Claude Opus worth the extra ₹ for RAG? For nuanced, conversational answers: yes. For fact-based Q&A: DeepSeek is fine.
Q: How do I handle documents larger than context? Chunk into 1–3K-token segments, embed, retrieve, rerank, then pass top 5–10 to the LLM.
Get started in rupees → https://unoblox.ai/sign-in
More from unoblox
Comparisons
Nemotron vs Llama: Open Model Comparison
Comparisons
Mistral vs Qwen: Which API to Pick in India
Comparisons
Best Reasoning LLM API for India (₹ Pricing)
Comparisons
Best Cheap LLM API in India: ₹ Price List
Comparisons
o3 vs GPT-5 for Reasoning: India ₹ Guide
Comparisons
Kimi vs Qwen: Which Model for Coding in India
Start building in rupees
Call every major model through one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, billed in ₹ on a GST invoice.